Математическое мышление - читать онлайн книгу. Автор: Джо Боулер cтр.№ 70

Mathematics Teaching and Learning to Teach, University of Michigan. SeanNumbers-Ofala video [Online]. 2010 // http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/65013.

McDermott R. P. The acquisition of a child by a learning disability // S. Chaiklin, J. Lave, eds. Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Pp. 269–305.

McKnight C., Crosswhite F. J., Dossey J. A. et al. The underachieving curriculum — Assessing US school mathematics from an international perspective. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing, 1987.

Mikki J. Students’ homework and TIMSS 2003 mathematics results. International Conference, Teaching Mathematics Retrospective and Perspective, 2006.

Moser J., Schroder H. S., Heeter C. et al. Mind your errors: Evidence for a neural mechanism linking growth mindset to adaptive post error adjustments // Psychological Science. 2011. Vol. 22. Pp. 1484–1489.

Moses R., Cobb J. C. Radical equations: Math, literacy and civil rights. Boston: Beacon Press, 2001.

Mueller C. M., Dweck C. S. Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998. Vol. 75 (1). Pp. 33–52.

Murphy M. C., Garcia J. A., Zirkel S. The role of faculty mindsets in women’s performance and participation in STEM (in prep).

Nasir N. S., Cabana C., Shreve B. et al., eds. Mathematics for equity: A framework for successful practice. New York: Teachers College Press, 2014.

Noguchi S. Palo Alto math teachers oppose requiring Algebra II to graduate. San Jose Mercury News, 2012, January 14 // http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_19748978.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Lessons from PISA 2012 for the United States, strong performers and successful reformers in education. Paris: OECD, 2013.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The ABC of gender equality in education: Aptitude, behaviour, confidence. A Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) Report. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015.

Paek P., Foster D. Improved mathematical teaching practices and student learning using complex performance assessment tasks. National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2012.

Park J., Brannon E. Training the approximate number system improves math proficiency. Association for Psychological Science, 1–7. 2013.

Parrish S. Number talks: Helping children build mental math and computation strategies, grades K–5, updated with Common Core Connections. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions, 2014.

Piaget J. The child’s construction of reality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.

Piaget J. Piaget’s theory // P. H. Mussen, ed. Carmichael’s manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley, 1970.

Picciotto H. Lab gear activities for Algebra I. Mountain View, CA: Creative Publications, 1995.

Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). PISA 2012 results in focus. What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris, France: OECD, 2012.

Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). Does homework perpetuate inequities in education? PISA in Focus 46, 2015 // http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/does-homework-perpetuate-inequities-in-education_5jxrhqhtx2xt-en;jsessionid=f7tsdsj7up8t.x-oecd-live-02.

Pulfrey C., Buchs C., Butera F. Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation // Journal of Educational Psychology. 2011. Vol. 103 (3). Pp. 683–700 // http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fabrizio_Butera/publication/232450947_Why_grades_engender_performance-avoidance_goals_The_mediating_role_of_autonomous_motivation/links/02bfe50ed4ebfd0670000000.pdf.

Reeves D. B. The learning leader: How to focus school improvement for better results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development, 2006.

Romero C. Coping with challenges during middle school: The role of implicit theories of emotion (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 2013 // http://purl.stanford.edu/ft278nx7911.

Rose H., Betts J. R. The effect of high school courses on earnings // Review of Economics and Statistics. 2004. Vol. 86 (2). Pp. 497–513.

Schmidt W. H., McKnight C. C., Cogan L. S. et al. Facing the consequences: Using TIMSS for a closer look at US mathematics and science education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.

Schmidt W. H., McKnight C. C., Raizen S. A. A splintered vision: An investigation of US science and mathematics education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.

Schwartz D., Bransford J. A time for telling // Cognition and Instruction. 1998. Vol. 16 (4). Pp. 475–522.

Schwartz L. A mathematician grappling with his century. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser, 2001.

Seeley C. Faster isn’t smarter: Messages about math, teaching, and learning in the 21st century. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions, 2009.

Seeley C. Smarter than we think: More messages about math, teaching, and learning in the 21st century. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions, 2014.

Selling S. K. Learning to represent, representing to learn // Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 2015.

Silva E., White T. Pathways to improvement: Using psychological strategies to help college students’ master developmental math. Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2013.

Silver E. A. On mathematical problem posing // For the Learning of Mathematics. 1994. Vol. 14 (1). Pp. 19–28.

Sims P. Daring to stumble on the road to discovery // New York Times. 2011, August 6 // http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/07/jobs/07pre.html?_r=0.

Solomon Y. Not belonging? What makes a functional learner identity in undergraduate mathematics? // Studies in Higher Education. 2007. Vol. 32 (1). Pp. 79–96.

Stanford Center for Professional Development. How to learn math: For teachers and parents // http://scpd.stanford.edu/instanford/how-to-learn-math.jsp.