Математическое мышление - читать онлайн книгу. Автор: Джо Боулер cтр.№ 69

читать книги онлайн бесплатно
 
 

Онлайн книга - Математическое мышление | Автор книги - Джо Боулер

Cтраница 69
читать онлайн книги бесплатно

Fong A. B., Jaquet K., Finkelstein N. Who repeats Algebra I, and how does initial performance relate to improvement when the course is repeated? (REL 2015–059). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory West, 2014 // http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.

Frazier L. To raise student achievement, North Clackamas schools add lessons in perseverance. Oregonian/OregonLive, 2015, February 25 // http://www.oregonlive.com/education/index.ssf/2015/02/to_raise_student_achievement_n.html.

Galloway M. K., Pope D. Hazardous homework? The relationship between homework, goal orientation, and well-being in adolescence // Encounter: Education for Meaning and Social Justice. 2007. Vol. 20 (4). Pp. 25–31.

Girl Scouts of the USA with the National Center for Women & Information Technology (NCWIT). Evaluating promising practices in informal science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education for girls, 2008 // http://www.ncwit.org/sites/default/files/legacy/pdf/NCWIT-GSUSAPhaseIIIReport_FINAL.pdf.

Good C., Rattan A., Dweck C. S. Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2012. Vol. 102 (4). Pp. 700–717.

Gray E., Tall D. Duality, ambiguity, and flexibility: A “proceptual” view of simple arithmetic // Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 1994. Vol. 25 (2). Pp. 116–140.

Gunderson E. A., Gripshover S. J., Romero C. et al. Parent praise to 1–3 year-olds predicts children’s motivational frameworks 5 years later // Child Development. 2013. Vol. 84 (5). Pp. 1526–1541.

Gutstein E., Lipman P., Hernandez P., de los Reyes R. Culturally relevant mathematics teaching in a Mexican American context // Journal for Research in Mathematic Education. 1997. Vol. 28 (6). Pp. 709–737.

Haack D. Disequilibrium (I): Real learning is disruptive. A Glass Darkly (blog). 2011, January 31 // http://blog4critique.blogspot.com/2011/01/disequilibrium-i-real-learning-is.html.

Hersh R. What is mathematics, really? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Horn I. S. Learning on the job: A situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics departments // Cognition and Instruction. 2005. Vol. 23 (2). Pp. 207–236.

Humphreys C., Parker R. Making number talks matter: Developing mathematical practices and deepening understanding, grades 4–10. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers, 2015.

Jacob W. [Math Acceleration]. Personal communication. 2015.

Jones M. G., Howe A., Rua M. J. Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists // Science Education. 2000. Vol. 84. Pp. 180–192.

Karni A., Meyer G., Rey-Hipolito C. et al. The acquisition of skilled motor performance: Fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex // PNAS. 1998. Vol. 95 (3). Pp. 861–868.

Khan S. The one world schoolhouse: Education reimagined. New York: Twelve, 2012.

Kitsantas A., Cheema J., Ware W. H. Mathematics achievement: The role of homework and self-efficacy beliefs // Journal of Advanced Academics. 2011. Vol. 22 (2). Pp. 310–339.

Klarreich E. Meet the first woman to win math’s most prestigious prize // Quanta Magazine. 2014, August 13 // http://www.wired.com/2014/08/maryam-mirzakhani-fields-medal.

Kohn A. Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, praise, and other bribes. New York: Mariner Books, 1999.

Kohn A. The schools our children deserve: Moving beyond traditional classrooms and tougher standards. New York: Mariner Books, 2000.

Kohn A. Teachers who have stopped assigning homework (blog). 2008, September // http://www.alfiekohn.org/blogs/teachers-stopped-assigning-homework.

Kohn A. The case against grades. 2011, November // http://www.alfiekohn.org/article/case-grades.

Koonlaba A. E. 3 visual artists — and tricks — for integrating the arts into core subjects // Education Week Teacher. 2015, February 24 // http://www.edweek.org/tm/articles/2015/02/24/3-visual-artists-and-tricks-for-integrating-the-arts.html.

Langer-Osuna J. How Brianna became bossy and Kofi came out smart: Understanding the differentially mediated identity and engagement of two group leaders in a project-based mathematics classroom // Canadian Journal for Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education. 2011. Vol. 11 (3). Pp. 207–225.

Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area. Held back: Addressing misplacement of 9th grade students in Bay Area school math classes. 2013, January // www.lccr.com.

Lee D. N. Black girls serving as their own role models in STEM // Scientific American. 2014, November 25 // http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/urban-scientist/2014/11/25/black-girls-serving-as-their-own-role-models-in-stem.

Lee J. Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress toward equity? // Educational Researcher. 2002. Vol. 31 (1). Pp. 3–12.

Lemos M. S., Veríssimo L. The relationships between intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and achievement, along elementary school // Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014. Vol. 112. Pp. 930–938.

Leslie S.-J., Cimpian A., Meyer M., Freeland E. Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines // Science. 2015. Vol. 347 (6219). Pp. 262–265.

Lupton T., Pratt S., Richardson K. Exploring long division through division quilts // Centroid. 2014. Vol. 40 (1). Pp. 3–8.

Maguire E., Woollett K., Spiers H. London taxi drivers and bus drivers: A structural MRI and neuropsychological analysis // Hippocampus. 2006. Vol. 16 (12). Pp. 1091–1101.

Mangels J. A., Butterfield B., Lamb J. et al. Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model // Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2006. Vol. 1 (2). Pp. 75–86.

Вернуться к просмотру книги Перейти к Оглавлению Перейти к Примечанию