Ум в движении. Как действие формирует мысль - читать онлайн книгу. Автор: Барбара Тверски cтр.№ 95

Время структурируется пространством (а не наоборот)

Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28.

Язык и пространство

Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. L. Pick Jr. & L. P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application (pp. 225–282). New York, NY: Plenum.

Жесты меняют мышление о времени

Jamalian, A., & Tversky, B. (2012). Gestures alter thinking about time. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles, & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 34, 551–557.

Искажения в воспоминаниях о событиях во времени

Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Prohaska, V. (1988). Hierarchical organization in ordered domains: Estimating the dates of events. Psychological Review, 95, 471–484.

Loftus, E. F., & Marburger, W. (1983). Since the eruption of Mt. St. Helens, has anyone beaten you up? Improving the accuracy of retrospective reports with landmark events. Memory and Cognition, 11, 114–120.

Гомеостаз

Bernard, C. (1927). An introduction to the study of experimental medicine. Translated by H. C. Greene. New York, NY: Macmillan. (Оригинальное издание было опубликовано в 1865 г.)

Cannon, W. B. (1963). The wisdom of the body. New York, NY: Norton Library. (Первое издание было опубликовано в 1932 г.)

Обратная связь в компьютерах

Wiener, N. (1961). Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine (Vol. 25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

В языке аймара прошлое впереди

Núñez, R., & Cooperrider, K. (2013). The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(5), 220–229.

Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401–450.

В китайском литературном языке (и календарях) прошлое может быть внизу

Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22.

Fuhrman, O., McCormick, K., Chen, E., Jiang, H., Shu, D., Mao, S., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive Science, 35(7), 1305–1328.

Направление времени – это направление письма

Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23(4), 515–557.

Обозначение времени жестом слева направо

Santiago, J., Lupáñez, J., Pérez, E., & Funes, M. J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 512–516.

Перспектива в письменных и устных языках

Emmorey, K., Tversky, B., & Taylor, H. A. (2000). Using space to describe space: Perspective in speech, sign, and gesture. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2(3), 157–180.

Символическая дистанция

Banks, W. P., & Flora, J. (1977). Semantic and perceptual processes in symbolic comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 278–290.

Holyoak, K. J., & Mah, W. A. (1981). Semantic congruity in symbolic comparisons: Evidence against an expectancy hypothesis. Memory and Cognition, 9, 197–204.

Moyer, R. S. (1973). Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics. Perception and Psychophysics, 1, 180–184.

Paivio, A. (1978). Mental comparisons involving abstract attributes. Memory and Cognition, 6, 199–208.

Символическая дистанция у других биологических видов

D’Amato, M. R., & Colombo, M. (1990). The symbolic distance effect in monkeys (Cebus paella). Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 133–140.

Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (2004). Language and the origin of numerical concepts. Science, 306(5695), 441–443.

Транзитивный логический вывод у других биологических видов

Bond, A. B, Kamil, A. C, & Balda, R. P. (2003). Social complexity and transitive inference in corvids. Animal Behavior, 65, 479–487.

Byrne, R. W., & Bates, L. A. (2007). Sociality, evolution and cognition. Current Biology, 17, 714–723.

Byrne, R. W. & Whiten, A. (1988). Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

Davis, H. (1992). Transitive inference in rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 106, 342–349.

Grosenick, L., Clement, T. S., & Fernald, R. D. (2007). Fish can infer social rank by observation alone. Nature, 445, 429–432.

MacLean, E. L., Merritt, D. J., & Brannon, E. M. (2008). Social complexity predicts transitive reasoning in Prosimian primates. Animal Behavior, 76, 479–486.

Von Fersen, L., Wynee, C. D. L., Delius, J. D., & Staddon, J. E. R. (1991). Transitive inference formation in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 334–341.

Система приблизительных количеств у детей и представителей других биологических видов

Brannon, E. M., & Terrace, H. S. (1998). Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. Science, 282(5389), 746–749.

Brannon, E. M., Wusthoff, C. J., Gallistel, C. R., & Gibbon, J. (2001). Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: Evidence for a linear subjective number scale. Psychological Science, 12(3), 238–243.

Cantlon, J. F., Platt, M. L., & Brannon, E. M. (2009). Beyond the number domain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 83–91.

Gallistel, C. R., Gelman, R., & Cordes, S. (2006). The cultural and evolutionary history of the real numbers. Evolution and Culture, 247.

Henik, A., Leibovich, T., Naparstek, S., Diesendruck, L., & Rubinsten, O. (2012). Quantities, amounts, and the numerical core system. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 186.

McCrink, K., & Spelke, E. S. (2010). Core multiplication in childhood. Cognition, 116(2), 204–216.