12 правил жизни. Противоядие от хаоса - читать онлайн книгу. Автор: Джордан Питерсон cтр.№ 115

¹⁷⁶ Gatto J. N. The underground history of American education: A school teachers intimate investigation of the problem of modern schooling. New York: Odysseus Group. 2000.

¹⁷⁷ См. статью Why are the majority of university students women? Statistics Canada. Источник: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/81-004-x/2008001/article/10561 -eng.htm

¹⁷⁸ См., например: Hango D. Gender differences in science, technology, engineering, mathematics and computer science (STEM) programs at university. Statistics Canada. 2015, 75-006-X. Источник: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/access_acces/ alternative_alternatif.action?l=eng&loc=/pub/75-006-x/2013001/ article/11874-eng.pdf

¹⁷⁹ Я не один так считаю. См., например: Hymowitz K.S. Manning up: How the rise of women has turned men into boys. New York: Basic Books. 2012.

¹⁸⁰ Cm. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2012/04/26/young-men-and-women-differ-on-the-importance-of-a-successful-marriage/

¹⁸¹ Cm. http://www.pewresearch.org/data-trend/society-and-demographics/ marriage/

¹⁸² Этот вопрос активно обсуждался в широкой печати: https:// www.thestar.com/life/201 l/02/25/women_lawyers_leaving_in_ droves.html; http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/women-criminal-law-1.3476637; http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/andrea-lekushoff/ female-lawyers-canada_ b_5000415.html

¹⁸³ Jaffe A., Chediak G., Douglas E., Tudor M., Gordon R. W., Ricca

L. Robinson S. Retaining and advancing women in national law firms. Stanford Law and Policy Lab, White Paper. 2016. Источник: https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ Women-in-Law-White-Paper-FINAL-May-31-2016.pdf

¹⁸⁴ Conroy-Beam D., Buss D. M., Pham M. N., Shackelford T. K. How sexually dimorphic are human mate preferences? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2015, 41, 1082-1093. Анализ того, как предпочтения женского пола меняются вследствие чисто биологических (овуляторных) факторов, см. в статье: Gildersleeve К., Haselton М. G., Fales М. R. Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A metaanalytic review. Psychological Bulletin. 2014,140,1205-1259.

¹⁸⁵ Cm.: Greenwood J., Nezih G., Kocharov G, Santos C. Marry your like: Assortative mating and income inequality. IZA discussion paper No. 7895. 2014. Источник: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/93282

¹⁸⁶ Хороший анализ этих мрачных вопросов см. у: Suh G. W., Fabricious W. V., Parke R. D., Cookston J. T., Braver S. L., Saenz D. S. Effects of the interparental relationship on adolescents’ emotional security and adjustment: The important role of fathers. Developmental Psychology, 52,1666-1678.

¹⁸⁷ Hicks S. R. C. Explaining postmodernism: Skepticism and socialism from Rousseau to Foucault. Santa Barbara, CA: Ockham’ Razor Multimedia Publishing. 2011. Pdf доступен по ссылке: http:// www.stephenhicks.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Hicks-EP-Full.pdf

¹⁸⁸ Higgins D. M., Peterson J. B., Pihl R.O. Prefrontal cognitive ability, intelligence, Big Five personality, and the prediction of advanced academic and workplace performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 298-319.

¹⁸⁹ Carson S. H., Peterson J. B., Higgins D. M. Reliability, validity and factor structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal. 2005,17, 37-50.

¹⁹⁰ Bouchard T. J., McGue M. Familial studies of intelligence: a review. Science. 1981, 212, 1055-1059; Brody N. Intelligence. New York: Gulf Professional Publishing. 1992; Plomin R., Petrill S. A. Genetics and intelligence. What’s new? Intelligence. 1997, 24, 41-65.

¹⁹¹ Schiff M., Duyme M., Dumaret A., Stewart J., Tomkiewicz S., Feingold J. Intellectual status of working-class children adopted early into upper-middle-class families. Science. 1978, 200, 1503-1504; Capron C., Duyme M. Assessment of effects of socioeconomic status on IQ in a full cross-fostering study. Nature. 1989, 340, 552-554.

¹⁹² Kendler K. S., Turkheimer E., Ohlsson H., Sundquist J., Sundquist K. Family environment and the malleability of cognitive ability: a Swedish national home-reared and adopted-away cosibling control study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA. 2015, 112, 4612-4617.

¹⁹³ Позиция ОЭСР отражена в статье Closing the gender gap: Sweden (Преодоление гендерного неравенства: Швеция), которая начинается с обзора статистики, показывающей, что девочки имеют преимущество перед мальчиками при получении образования и что женщины превалируют в сфере здравоохранения, а затем обличает по-прежнему существующее преимущество мужчин в компьютерной сфере. Источник:// www.oecd.org/sweden/Closing%20the%20Gender%20Gap%20 -%20Sweden%20FINAL.pdf

¹⁹⁴ Eron L. D. Prescription for reduction of aggression. The American Psychologist. 1980, 35, 244-252 (p. 251).

¹⁹⁵ Вопрос рассматривается у: Peterson J. В. & Shane M. The functional neuro-anatomy and psychopharmacology of predatory and defensive aggression. In McCord J. (Ed.). Beyond empiricism: Institutions and intentions in the study ofcrime. 2004 (Advances in Criminological Theory, Vol. 13) (pp. 107-146). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Books; также см. Peterson J. B. & Flanders J. Play and the regulation of aggression. In Tremblay R. E., Hartup W. H. & Archer J. (Eds.). Developmental origins of aggression. 2005 (Chapter 12; pp. 133-157). New York: Guilford Press.

¹⁹⁶ Cm. Tremblay, R. E., Nagin D. S., Seguin J. R., et al. Physical aggression during early childhood: trajectories and predictors. Pediatrics. 2004,114,43-50.

¹⁹⁷ Heimberg R. G., Montgomery D., Madsen С. H., Heimberg J. S. Assertion training: A review of the literature. Behavior Therapy. 1977, 8, 953-971; Boisvert J.-M., Beaudry M., Bittar J. Assertiveness training and human communication processes. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. 1985,15, 58-73.

¹⁹⁸ Trull T. J., Widiger T. A. Dimensional models of personality: The five-factor model and the DSM-5. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience. 2013, 15, 135-46; Vickers К. E., Peterson J. B., Hornig C. D., Pihl R. O., Seguin J., Tremblay R. E. Fighting as a function of personality and neuro-psychological measures. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1996,794,411-412.