Эволюция. Триумф идеи - читать онлайн книгу. Автор: Карл Циммер cтр.№ 127

de Waal F.B.M. Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. Baltimore, Md. & London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.

____ Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996.

____, Lanting F. Bonobo: The forgotten ape. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1997.

Welch A.M., Semlitsch R.D., Gerhardt H.C. “Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs.” Science, 1998, 280: 1928–1930.

Wrangham R.W. “Subtie, secret female chimpanzees.” Science, 1997, 277: 774–775.

____, Peterson D. Demonic males: Apes and the origins of human violence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1996.

Глава 11: Разговорчивая обезьяна

Allman J.M. Evolving brains. New York: Scientific American Library/ Freeman, 1999.

Barkow J.H., Cosmides L., Tooby J. The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Baron-Cohen S., Tager-Flusberg H., Cohen D.J. Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Buss D.M. The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York: Free Press, 2000.

____ Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston & London: Allyn & Bacon, 1999.

____, Haselton M.G., Shackelford Т.К., Bleske A.L., Wakefield J.C. “Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels.” American Psychologist, 1998, 53: 533–548.

Cosmides L. “The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task.” Cognition, 1989, 31: 187–276.

Coyne J.A., Berry A. “Rape as an adaptation.” Nature, 2000, 404: 121–122.

Cummins D.D., Allen С. The evolution of mind. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Darwin C. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray, 1871.

Deacon T.W. The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York & London: Norton, 1997.

Dunbar R.I.M. Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. London: Faber & Faber, 1996.

Emlen S.T. “An evolutionary theory of the family.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1995, 92: 8092–8099.

Fitch W.T. “The evolution of speech: A comparative review.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2000, 4: 258–267.

Gagneux P., Wills C., Gerloff U., Tautz D., Morin P.A., Boescb C., et al. “Mitochondrial sequences show diverse evolutionary histories of African hominoids.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1999, 96: 5077–5082.

Gould S.J. “The pleasures of pluralism.” New York Review of Books, June 26, 1997, 46–52.

____, Lewontin R.C. “The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme.” Proceeding of the Royal Society of London Series B, 1979, 205: 581–598.

Hare В., Call J., Agnetta В., Tomasello M. “Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see.” Animal Behaviour, 2000, 59: 771–785.

Hauser M. Wild minds: what animals really think. New York: Henry Holt, 2000.

Holden C. “No last word on language origins.” Science, 1998, 282: 1455–1459.

Hrdy S.B. Mother nature: A history of mothers, infants, and natural selection. New York: Pantheon Books, 1999.

Johanson D.C., Edgar B. From Lucy to language. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996.

Kegl J. “The Nicaraguan sign language project: An overview.” Signpost, 1994, 7: 24–31.

____, Senghas A., Coppola M. “Creation through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua.” In: DeGraff M., ed., Language contact and language change: The intersection of language acquisition, Creole genesis, and diachronic syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1999, pp. 179–237.

Klein R.G. The human career: Human biological and cultural origins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

Miller G.F. The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Doubleday, 2000.

Nowak M.A., Krakauer D.C. “The evolution of language.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1999, 96: 8028–8033.

____, Krakauer D.C., Dress A. “An error limit for the evolution of language.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 1999, 266: 2131–2136.

O’Connell J.F., Hawkes K., Blurton Jones N.G. “Grandmothering and the evolution of Homo erectus.” Journal of Human Evolution, 1999, 36: 461–485.

Osborne L. “A linguistic big bang.” New York Times Magazine, October 24, 1999: 84–89.

Penton-Voak I.S., Perrett D.I., Castles D.L., Kobayashi Т., Burt D.M., Murray L.K., et al. “Menstrual cycle alters face preference”. Nature, 1999, 399: 741–742.

Perrett D.I., Lee K.J., Penton-Voak I., Rowland D., Yoshikawa S., Burt D.M., et al. “Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness.” Nature, 1998, 394: 884–887.

Perrett D.I., May K.A., Yoshikawa S. “Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness.” Nature, 1994, 368: 239–242.

Pinker S. How the mind works. New York: Norton, 1997.

____ The language instinct. New York: Morrow, 1994.

Richmond B.G., Strait D.S. “Evidence that humans evolved from a knuckle-walking ancestor.” Nature, 2000, 404: 382–386.

Sahlins M.D. The use and abuse of biology: An anthropological critique of sociobiology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1976.

Scheib J.E., Gangestad S.W., Thornhill R. “Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 1999, 266: 1913–1917.

Segerstråle U.C.O. Defenders of the truth: The battle for science in the sociobiology debate and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Singh D. “Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, 65: 293–307.

Tattersall I., Schwartz J.H. Extinct humans. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000.

Thornhill R., Gangestad S.W. “Facial attractiveness.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1999,3:452–460.

____, Møller A.P. “Developmental stability, disease and medicine.” Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1997, 72: 497–548.